Second-round review
Web23 Oct 2015 · Thank you for the second round of Reviewers’ comments and the opportunity to further revise the paper: getting the manuscript into the form in which the results are most relevant to and best understood by readers is a high priority for my co-authors and myself, and we appreciate the time and effort the Web5 Apr 2024 · One round of reviews wasn’t enough for Reviewer 2… My reply to Reviewer 2 – ROUND 2 Thankfully it was accepted after the second round of review, and actually ended up being selected for this accolade, whatever most notable means?!
Second-round review
Did you know?
WebThe editor made timely decisions and also provided very helpful feedback and summaries of the 3 reviewers statements. I did not particularly like the delivery system for the reviews … WebThe first round of peer review takes place after you’ve designed your study, but before you’ve collected or analyzed any data. ... Return to that list but, before you move to your second choice, you may wish to assess whether any feedback you’ve received during peer review has changed your opinion. Your article may also be quite different ...
Web8 Apr 2024 · Plot Summary. Setsu was summoned to another world to become a warrior, and he saved the world. As a result, he became very popular, and he is happily living his … Web14 Apr 2024 · It’s the second day of the AFL’s Gather Round. First, Fremantle and Gold Coast meet at Norwood Oval, before Richmond and the Sydney Swans clash in a big Friday night match.
Web17 Feb 2015 · So the second round is generally quicker than the first round of peer review as the reviewers are already familiar with the paper. A quick review and no request for … Web7 Apr 2024 · Koepka’s round hinged on the four par-5s. He birdied the second, 13th and 15th holes and stuck his second shot from 250 yards out on the par-5 eighth to 13 feet and …
Web6 Mar 2024 · David Francis Barfknecht raises a good point about the time each round of peer review takes. In my experience, it is usually takes about six months for reviewers to …
WebDoing the Second Read-Through As you're reading through the manuscript for a second time, you'll need to keep in mind the argument's construction, the clarity of the language and content. With regard to the argument’s construction, you should identify: Any places where the meaning is unclear or ambiguous Any factual errors Any invalid arguments tractor hydraulic flow divider valveWeb10 Jan 2024 · The number of the round is the number of editorial decisions you have received plus one. For instance, when you submit a manuscript for the first time, it is obviously on the ‘first round’ — and will be so until you get a decision. At this point, the manuscript moves to the ‘second round’ that is divided into two phases: i) revising ... tractor hydraulic fluid vs transmissionWeb18 Mar 2024 · Authors are not in a place where they can convincingly say the other reviewer is wrong. If I see that the other reviewer has made a mistake, I can point it out much more … theror of calfornia handbagsWeb9 Dec 2024 · 3a) your paper nonetheless has important results: then highlight that further research is necessary and your result is a move in the right direction. 3b) you cannot see … the rorschach\u0027s chroniclesWeb26 Aug 2024 · Answer: Ideally, the second round of peer review should take less time than the first round. This is because the revised paper is usually sent to the same set of reviewers who originally reviewed it, and they are already familiar with your paper. the rorschach test is an example of a nWeb9 Mar 2024 · To gain insight into the duration and quality of the scientific peer review process, we analyzed data from 3500 review experiences submitted by authors to the SciRev.sc website. Aspects studied are duration of the first review round, total review duration, immediate rejection time, the number, quality, and difficulty of referee reports, … the rorschach\\u0027s chroniclesWebThe last one isn't uncommon when one or more of the reviewers isn't thrilled with the way round 1 comments were addressed. (You said "new reviewers", but are you sure of that? In at least some disciplines, revisions go back to the original reviewers who are in best position to judge whether their initial concerns were sufficiently addressed.) tractor hydraulic hose extension