WebMar 28, 2024 · Sandoval v. Sessions, 866 F.3d 986, 993 (9th Cir. 2024). On the merits of the divisibility inquiry, the government did not argue to us that section 164.395 is divisible. We … WebJul 8, 2015 · Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088, 1091 (9th Cir. 2011); (2) Petitioner's ability to depart China with no issues—by using his own passport—belied his claim that the police are searching zealously for him and would arrest him upon …
Did you know?
WebFeb 22, 2024 · Garland, 37 F.4th 626, 632 (9th Cir. 2024), we deny the petition for review. 1. Alcantar-Garcia forfeited any challenge to the denial of CAT protection or asylum because … WebDec 22, 2015 · See, e.g., Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[B]ecause [the petitioner] did not raise [certain arguments] in his opening brief, we deem those issues waived.”); Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding that arguments not raised in a party’s opening brief generally are waived).
WebJun 13, 2011 · Holder, 629 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir. 2011); see also Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011) ("[M]inor inconsistencies regarding non-material and trivial … WebNos. 19-1155 & 19-1156 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _____ JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL, Petitioner, v. MING DAI, Respondent. JEFFREY A. …
WebDec 6, 2024 · Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 555 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir. 2009)); Soto-Olarte, 555 F.3d at 1091 (“Because the BIA’s opinion does not refer to the explanation that [petitioner] gave . . . and does not give the BIA’s reasons for considering that explanation WebApr 14, 2024 · Bhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Id. To reverse a credibility determination in particular, …
WebMar 21, 2024 · Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)). The evidence in the record does not compel a positive credibility determination. The Board permissibly relied on numerous inconsistencies between Nnaji's declaration and his testimony.
WebRizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011), overruled in part on other grounds by Alam, 11 F. 4th 1133. If the noncitizen offers an explanation that is “reasonable and plausible,” the IJ has to provide a “specific and cogent reason for rejecting” the explanation. booking a flight on delta airlinesWebSubstantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010). We must uphold an adverse credibility determination if substantial evidence supports even one ground relied on. Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088–89 (9th Cir ... Cole v. Holder, 659 F.3d 762, 771–72 (9th Cir. 2011). 3 ... booking a flight memeWebDec 11, 2024 · Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011). The BIA may rest an adverse credibility determination on an inconsistency or inaccuracy “without regard to whether” it “goes to the heart of the applicant’s claim.” 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii). 10 QIU V. BARR Although that standard is deferential, there must be a “specific cogent reason” for an … god of war the applecoreWebApr 28, 2024 · Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039–40 (9th Cir. 2010). In general, adverse credibility findings “are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)). We review de novo questions of law. Bhattarai v. god of war the applecore buried treasureWebJul 23, 2013 · Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir.2011). Under the substantial evidence standard, an adverse credibility finding is “conclusive unless any reasonable … god of war the 9 realms menuWebSep 2, 2010 · Opinion for Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Toggle … god of war thanos gauntletWebBhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Id. To reverse a credibility determination in particular, “we must find that the evidence not only supports [a contrary] conclusion, but compels it.” Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (alteration in original ... god of war the barrens